Policy Framework
National Action Plan
Name(Year):
● National Plastic Management Action Plan (2026-2035)
Brief Description:
- In Myanmar, to prevent the adverse impacts of plastic waste pollution on human health, ecosystems, and the environment, the National Plastic Management Action Plan was developed by a Technical Working Group (TWG) comprising relevant departments, state and regional governments, and private sector organizations.
- The National Plastic Management Action Plan (2026–2035) was issued under Order Notification No. 80/2025 from the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation.
- The NPMAP aims to transform Myanmar’s approach to plastic use and waste management, ensuring a sustainable, circular economy by 2035, while also contributing to regional efforts like the ASEAN Regional Action Plan for Combating Marine Debris.
- The NPMAP aims to protect human health and the environment from plastic pollution including marine plastic pollution through a comprehensive, full life-cycle approach. Its vision is to “end plastic pollution by creating a resource-efficient economy grounded in circular practices.”
- After the NPMAP was launched, three working groups will be established to implement plastic waste recycling strategies. These include: (1) the Working Group on Restricting Single-Use Plastics, (2) the Working Group on Implementing the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) System, and (3) the Working Group on the Importation of Virgin Plastics and Products.
- National Plastic Management Action Plan (NPMAP) prioritizes three core objectives: Reducing plastic waste into the system, developing a source-segregated waste collection system to minimize leakage into the environment and, promoting the use of circular materials and systems.
- To achieve these goals, the NPMAP sets the following national targets:
- Enact legislation to restrict the use of single-use plastics (SUPs),
- Limit and reduce the import of virgin plastic and plastic scrap (recyclables),
- Promote plastic recovery through a multi-stakeholder approach,
- Reduce overall waste generation and increase recovery by promoting waste separation and recycling of plastic,
- Apply 3R principles and circular production practices to all manufacturing processes supported by Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR),
- Replace SUPs with sustainable alternatives, such as reusable, refillable, or biodegradable products.
- This action plan will implement the four key strategies: policymaking, research, public education, and private sector engagement to ensure effective implementation and achieve the desired outcomes of reducing plastic pollution and fostering a circular economy.
- This plan includes forty-one action plans, and three working groups will coordinate actions, monitor progress, and ensure that targets are met according to the defined timeline (short-term by 2026-2028, medium-term by 2028-2030, and long-term by 2030-2035).
Legal Framework
Name(Year):
Environmental Conservation Law (2012)
Brief Description:
Chapter VIII Management of Urban Environment include management of wastes and pollution control.
Name(Year):
Environmental Conservation Rules (2014)
Brief Description:
In Chapter (IX) Waste Management, the Ministry shall carry out waste treatment by the categories of business which emit or produce solid wastes, liquid wastes, emissions, radiations which contain poisonous and hazardous materials by establishing their own facility or center, or collective facility or center.
Name(Year):
Myanmar National Waste Management Strategy and Master Plan (2018-2030)
Brief Description:
The vision of Myanmar’s National Waste Management Strategy and Master Plan (2018-2030) is to create a “Sustainable, Green, Clean and Healthy Environment Towards a Brighter Future for Myanmar”. The vision is aligned with the principles outlined in the National Sustainable Development Strategy (NSDS,2009) and the National Environment Policy (2018). The mission is to develop and implement a holistic and integrated waste management strategy founded on the principles of inclusiveness, zero waste, zero emissions, and a circular economy to achieve a greener, cleaner, and healthier environment in Myanmar.
■ In Preparation
Name: Standard Operating Procedure-SOP for Industries and Urban Waste Management in Coastal Area
Brief Description:
- This SOP focuses on the six coastal regions of Myanmar and addresses the management of industrial and urban waste.
- It includes five action plans: generation, collection and transportation, transfer to stations, treatment, and final disposal.
- The procedure has been submitted to the cabinet for official approval.
- Once approved, under the leadership and guidance of the State/Region Government, relevant departments, committees, and bodies will be established and carry out monitoring and inspection of waste management systems related to industrial and urban activities in coastal areas to ensure effective governance and compliance.
Indicators and/or Targets
■ Plastic Recycling: National Plastic Management Action Plan
Indicators:
- Establishing systematic locations for Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs) to collect reusable materials from waste in urban municipalities and rural areas, as well as designated sites for proper landfilling.
- Implementing a system starting from major cities (Yangon, Mandalay, Nay Pyi Taw) in which plastic bottle manufacturing companies adopt a return scheme that allows consumers to return recyclable types of plastic bottles and receive a refund or financial incentive.
Targets (if any):
- A sufficient fund can be established and utilized to cover the costs of collecting and managing non-recyclable plastic waste.
- By segregating plastic waste at the source, each sector can more effectively manage and recover recyclable materials, while organic waste can be properly directed to designated landfill sites for final disposal.
■ Plastic Use Reduction: National Plastic Management Action Plan
Indicators:
- Restricting specific types of SUPs based on their applications and relevant sectors
- Implementing a fee system for SUP usage, with charges paid by consumers depending on location and sector
- Conducting regulatory inspections to ensure that plastic-related industries are appropriately licensed in accordance with SUP usage restrictions.
Targets (if any):
- Avoiding the use of unnecessary plastic materials can help reduce waste generation and promote the use of alternative materials.
- By informing consumers that plastic packaging bags are not provided for free at markets and food shops, they can be encouraged to bring and use alternative bags.
Technical Standards, Guidelines and Methodologies
Topics
■ Others:
Brief Description:
Although we didn’t have specific guidelines for monitoring marine litter, we use Clean Cities, Blue Ocean (CCBO) Program’s Marine Litter Audit Guidebook to monitor and assess marine plastic litter along the beaches.
Measures
| Measures across Value Chain | |
| Actions for encouraging sustainable / circular product design (example: improved durability, reparability, recyclability, reduction of material use per product…etc.) | No |
| Policy actions for encouraging plastic alternatives, recycled materials at production stage. | Yes |
|
Specific Measures:
|
|
| Steps taken towards restricting microplastics in products. | No |
| Reduce single-use plastic (shopping bags, straws etc.) by regulations or voluntary measures (such as ban, levy, others) | Yes |
|
■ Regulatory Measures (ex: production ban, Ban on use..etc) ■ Others
|
|
| Introduce Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) | No |
|
Brief Description: |
|
| Improve waste management and recycling system | Yes |
|
Specific Measures:
|
|
| Promoting plastic waste re-use, recycling and recovery opportunities | Yes |
|
Specific Measures:
|
|
| Install capturing trap/filter on drainage/river | No |
| Conduct clean-up activities in rivers/ wetlands/ beaches/ coasts/ coral reefs/ sea floor, involving local communities involving local communities | Yes |
|
Specific Measures:
|
|
| Issue-specific Measures | |
| <1> Abandoned, Lost and Discarded Fishing Gear (ALDFG) | |
| Taken/to be taken National Level Action and/or Community Level Action on Clean sea initiatives including ghost net retrieval, ocean-bound plastics etc. | No |
| Taken actions for preventing abandoned, lost and discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) being generated. | No |
| Created/creating collection/recycling mechanism for ALDFG | No |
| <2> Port Waste Reception For waste management in ports, please provide details regarding their solid waste management practices/facilities including: |
|
| Whether there is an applicable legal framework | No |
| The institution(s) responsible for (or playing a central role in, if voluntary action) managing the waste from ships? (example: port management authority, fishers' association...etc.) | - |
| Whether ports possess waste reception facilities/systems to handle solid waste from ships, the volume of waste collected and the percentage of ports with waste reception facilities? | No |
| The handling procedures for each distinct waste stream once onshore. | No |
| Partnership and Innovation | |
| Boost multi-stakeholder involvement and awareness-raising | Yes |
|
Specific Measures: Conduct nationwide and local campaigns using social media, workshops, and community meetings to educate the public on sustainable waste practices, the importance of recycling, and reducing single-use plastics. To promote proper waste management practices, the Good Environmental Management Award is being presented to companies, factories, and businesses on World Environment Day. |
|
| Encourage/ Incentivize action by private sector companies to reduce/ sustainably manage their plastic waste. | No |
| Encourage public awareness on MPL issues through formal education system and/or curriculum for | No |
| Promote innovative solutions through Research & Development (e.g., subsidy program, investment fund etc.) | No |
| Monitoring, Data Management, Understanding Flow of Plastics/MPL | |
| Conduct Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of plastic products. What are the challenges if LCA is not conducted? | No |
| Conduct Material Flow Analysis (MFA) on plastics. What are the challenges if MFA is not conducted? | No |
| Conduct monitoring / estimation / scientific research on leakage of plastics/microplastics to the natural environment and/or flow of ocean surface. What are the challenges if these actions are not conducted? |
Yes |
|
Scope: ■ Regional Brief Description: According to research paper “Litter on the seafloor along the African coast and in the Bay of the Bengal based on trawl bycatches from 2011 to 2020” (L.Buhl-Mortensen et al.,2022), in the countries of the Bay of Bengal such as Myanmar and Thailand were relatively high litters related to fishing gears. Fishing gears dominated records of weight for Morocco, Mauritania, Ivory Coast, Myanmar, and Sri Lanka. |
|
| International Collaboration | |
| Participate in international cooperation through international organizations, multi-national groups, etc. | Yes |
|
Specific Measures: |
|
| Support target region by your international cooperation initiatives/projects: South, Central and Southeast Asia | Yes |
|
Target Regions: Specific Measures: |
|
Challenges
■ Recycling System Improvement
Specific Challenges:
- Lack of formal recycling infrastructure and reliance on informal sector operations.
- Low recycling rates with significant leakage into the environment.
- Lack of municipal support for recycling activities, which limits the participation of informal collectors in plastic waste management.
- Insufficient facilities and resources to segregate and recycle waste effectively.
■ Proper Waste Management System (Including Lack of Local Capacity)
Specific Challenges:
- Inadequate infrastructure for waste collection, segregation, and disposal.
- Insufficient public participation.
- Due to limited financial support and insufficient public awareness.
■ Data Collection Related to Marine Plastic Litter
Specific Challenges:
- Due to limited financial resources, it is not possible to accurately collect data on the types, quantities, and storage capacities of waste generated, resulting in a lack of reliable waste data.
■ Lack of Financial Incentives for Waste Treatment in General
Specific Challenges:
- Limited funding and budget allocation for waste management and recycling initiatives.
- No incentives or subsidies for adopting environmentally friendly waste treatment technologies.
■ Lack of Financial Incentives for Technology Development
Specific Challenges:
- Limited funding and no subsidies for developing waste management technologies.
- Low investment attractiveness due to unprofitable infrastructure and lack of tipping fees.
- No financial mechanisms like grants or loans to support innovation in waste management.
- Limited incentives for adopting circular economy practices.
Best Practices
■ National Level
Description:
Environmental Education Programs
As the Environmental Conservation Department-ECD under the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation coordination with other relevant departments are emphasizing the reduction of plastic waste reaching the sea to the greatest extent possible the entire country, including all states and regions.
Contact Details
Name: Dr. San Oo
Position: Director General
Division: Environmental Conservation Department
Organization: Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation
Email: ecd.nr48@gmail.com, sthandaroo@gmail.com

